Monday, August 22, 2016

Former Indian Army Officer From Kashmir Made Thousands Cry with His Moving Facebook Post


By Soha Naveed

 Kashmir – the forgotten conflict – a country where you can find barbed wires and flowers entwined in a romantic, tragic union. Kashmir screams for help from the entire world, yet everyone turns a blind eye to them.
“I do not love you and your Kashmir. I could not. I was not expected to. I was not educated too. I was not trained to”, said Dinesh Tiwari, a former Indian army officer who offered his services in Kashmir while mixed in the war of his own – either to offer his duties or to resist his humane emotions against the unjust taking place in Kashmir.
Drenched in pain and agony, Tiwari recently shared his story on his Facebook page where he talked about his childhood in Nepal and his services in Kashmir.
Tiwari shared the pathos, bathos and his own emotions during the encounter he had with a Kashmiri child that will make you wonder why Kashmir is still burning.

“I have been to Kashmir. No, not as a tourist. I have lived there. I have worked there. I was part of the heavy military instrument of the Indian State in the paradise, guarding it from the heaven dwellers themselves. And some mischievous neighbors too. …

As a 21 year old, with the might of one of the biggest militaries in the world behind me and its command pinned on my shoulders, its determination manifested in the AK in my hand, I have roamed the towns and villages with authority which none of the Burhan Wanis or Bhatts or Wazirs or Bhans or Wattals or anybody else whose land it was, would have dared to.Ironically, as a Citizen of Nepal, serving in the Indian Army, I was a bundle of contradictions myself.
When I led a group of armed men through a tense neighborhood, I could not help recall the state I was in myself as a teenager, back home in Nepal, angry and frustrated because of the curfew imposed in my hometown, from six in the evening to six in the morning every day for years.
When the Maoist insurgency was at its peak, I was a teenager. I have been frisked, violated, insulted; made to do pushups and squats just because I asked the police man at the check post to repeat himself when he instructed something and I did not properly hear.
There were regular visits to our houses– by police in uniform, by police without uniform, by a secret police who every one knew was a secret police; also from unknown people with weapons prominently hidden under wraps, meant to be seen and feared, demanding food, shelter, and money.
I was angry, very angry. I was angry at the then mysterious figure of Prachanda, whose only one picture in combat fatigues was public at that time. I was angry at the ideologue Dr Baburam Bhattarai — legendary Nepal topper (Board First) and PhD from JNU — who was known to be the brain behind the movement.
I was angry at the people who marched in my town with weapons held high, after they blew away the local bank and the police station.
I was also angry at the policeman who frisked me, dragged me by my arm, threw my bag scattering away all my stuff on the floor and pinned me down to the ground and poked the back of my neck with a pointed object. It wasn’t a stick. It was cold and heavy. I did not see it but a chill ran down my spine.
It blew up the anger. I was angry at the government. At the state, which had ignored so many people for so many years that they were ready to fight, and kill and die.
Also, I was angry at myself. Without knowing the reason, without a target, the anger was building up and building pressure and engulfing me.
I was lucky. I had options to flee. I fled at the right time.
When I looked at a beautiful Kashmiri child, who approached me with an innocent admiration and a genuine query, ‘You must be Kashmiri, are you Kashmiri?’, I was fumbling for an answer.
I would have liked to tell him — ‘Yes, I am.’
I would have loved to say — ‘Yes, we are. We are all Kashmiris. We are all heaven dwellers.’
I would have wanted him to know–‘We are here for you. We are your men.’
I would have wanted to give him a smile, a nudge, pinch his cheeks, and ruffle his hair a bit and say, ‘Yes, I am a Kashmiri. And I love Kashmir. And you.’
But I did not. Because I did not. I did not love Kashmir. And I did not love that child.
I was not a Kashmiri. And I was not a tourist.
Kashmir, for me was a duty. An assignment, an arduous task that had to be fulfilled to my utmost capability and most importantly, survived.
I did not pack a camera, few romantic novels and Faiz and Gulzar’s poetry books before stepping on to the heaven.
I was trained to kill, and armed for it. My literature was bloody.
As a preparation, I was not educated on the beauty the land was but on the contours of terror that prevailed within the landscape.
I did not go through accounts of romantic unions in the scenic backdrops, but brainstormed over hundreds of case studies of bloody and fatal encounters in the terrain.
For me Kashmir was not to be appreciated, but assessed, analyzed and acted upon, and survived.
For me the innocent child was not that innocent.
The images of children carrying messages, supplies and even weapons, read in the extensive case studies, immediately cropped up in my mind.
Even before noticing his sparkling beautiful blue eyes, pink apple-like cheeks, and loveliest smile, I had to scan through his whole body to know what was hidden.
Images of children blowing themselves away in front of security forces flashed before me even before I could comprehend the emotions in his voice.
Even before I could think of extending my hand to ruffle his hair, the grip on the AK tightened automatically and my trigger finger was alert.
No, my friend, I am not a Kashmiri. I could not be one. I was not expected to be one. Therefore, I was not educated to be one. I was not trained to be one.
And I do not love you and your Kashmir. I could not. I was not expected to. I was not educated to. I was not trained to.
I was fumbling for an answer. I did not reply.
The child’s mother came running, lifted him up and dragged him away hurriedly, slouching a bit, without even looking at me.
Today, he must be Burhan’s age. And we don’t love him still. And that is one of the reasons why Kashmir burns.” – Dinesh Tiwari, former Indian military officer.


Pakistan ‘not architect’ of Kashmir unrest: Omar Abdullah



BY NEWS DESK
Former chief minister of Indian-held Kashmir Omar Abdullah said on Wednesday that Pakistan was ‘not the architect’ of the present crisis in the Valley.
In a press conference in Srinagar, Abdullah blamed the Indian government for the situation in Kashmir saying, Pakistan could be “fishing in troubled water” in the state but the current situation in the Valley was not created by the neighbouring country. “They are not architects of the problem and they are not keeping it alive. It is our inability to address this anger that is keeping it alive,” Abdullah said.
The Indian government has long held Pakistan responsible for terrorism in the region, an accusation that the latter has vehemently denied. The former chief minister further said that opposition parties in the state had decided to approach President Pranab Mukherjee to apprise him of the ground situation. “When you say Kashmir is an integral part of India, you are talking only about the land. You need to own the people (living in that land),” he added.
Abdullah, who was joined by several leaders from other opposition parties, said the situation in Kashmir would only improve when the centre recognised the problem and tried to address it. “Today, both the state and the central governments are turning a blind eye to the situation. If you don’t recognise the anger, if you don’t address the root cause of this anger, how will the anger die? That’s why we are telling the Centre, ‘Please recognise (that) there is a problem,” he said.
The leader of the opposition in the held-Jammu and Kashmir Assembly also criticised Indian premier Narendra Modi for not addressing the Kashmir crisis. He added that Modi had taken notice of the Dalit agitation in Gujarat which was “far lesser” in magnitude. “This is because Modi feels ownership over the people and Gujarat,” Abdullah said.
“Why is it that we don’t get owned, our anger doesn’t get owned, our sentiment is not owned? If you don’t recognise this anger on ground, if you are unwilling to address the anger, then you are unwilling to own the people,” he added.


Prof Atta to open Global Biotechnology Congress in USA



BY APP
Former federal minister for science and technology Prof Attaur Rahman will open four-day Global Biotechnology Congress 2016 in Boston, USA, today (Monday).
An official of the International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences (ICCBS), University of Karachi, said on Sunday that this conference provides a platform for researchers and decision makers to present latest findings and learn about developments in biotechnology.
Many Nobel laureates and experts will participate in the conference which is fourth in the series, he added.
The conference will cover transnational nature of biotechnological research, with emphasis on both basic science and its applications in industry and academia. Throughout the course of the conference, scientists will have the opportunity to both network and hear leaders from the international academic and corporate biotechnology communities.
Prof Attaur Rahman, PhD in organic chemistry from Cambridge University (1968), has 1021 publications in several fields of organic chemistry, including 728 research publications, 37 international patents, 68 chapters in books and, 188 books published largely by major US and European presses.
He is editor-in-chief of eight European chemistry journals and editor of the world’s leading encyclopedic series of volumes on natural products “Studies in Natural Product Chemistry”. Its 47 volumes have been published under his editorship during the last two decades. Some 82 students have completed their PhD degrees under his supervision.
Prof Rahman is said to be the most decorated scientist of Pakistan, having won four civil awards Tamgha-i-Imtiaz, Sitara-i-Imtiaz, Hilal-i-Imtiaz and Nishan-i-Imtiaz.


Pakistani students win 4 Bronze medals at International Science Olympiads

Pakistani students continue to bring laurels for the country. In recent Science Olympiads held in various destinations all over the world, including Vietnam, Georgia, Hong Kong and Switzerland, young Pakistanis have brought home four Bronze medals and one honorable mention.
A team of students was selected under the STEM Careers Programme which has been initiated by the Higher Education Commission (HEC) and Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS) for young people interested in science and technology. The students were handpicked and trained by instructors from several Pakistani institutes, including National Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad; HEJ Research Institute, Karachi; COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Lahore; PIEAS, Islamabad and members of the STEM Careers Programme.
The top students were then selected to take part in various International programs, comprising of the 27th International Biology Olympiad, the 48th International Chemistry Olympiad, the 57th International Mathematics Olympiad and the 47th International Physics Olympiad.
The 27th International Biology Olympiad (IBO) was held in Hanoi, Vietnam from July 17th – 24th. Of the total four students who took part here, three of them grabbed top honors. Muhammad Alamgir Khan from Cadet College Hassan Abdal, Bakhtawar Ahmad from Hamza Army Public School and College, Rawalpindi, and Saffa Fatima from Lahore Grammar School won Bronze Medals.
Six students also participated at the 57th International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) held in Hong Kong but the team was not able to secure a prize.
The 47th International Physics Olympiad was held in Zurich, Switzerland from July 10th to 17th where Maimoon Siddiqui from Karachi Grammar School grabbed an honorable mention.
The 48th International Chemistry Olympiad (IChO) was held in Georgia from July 23rd to August 1st. Here, Muhammad Ismail from FFC Grammar School, Mirpur Mathelo, Sindh won the bronze medal.
These students are an addition to the young Pakistanis who have made the country proud this year. Earlier this summer, Sarah Ahmed of UET Lahore was awarded the Hero Microsoft Student Partner Award. Just recently, Pakistani students brought home the Bronze at Microsoft Office World Championship.
Image Source – IBO
News Source – 
The News


I Could Not Love Kashmir As I Was Not Trained To, Confession of an Ex-Indian Army Major

Ishaal Zehra

Meanwhile, as 22 former panchayat members associated with the Kashmir’s ruling People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and opposition National Conference (NC), in south Kashmir’s Pulwama district announced to quit the pro-India parties and join the ongoing resistance movement, the death toll in the ongoing Kashmir Intifada has risen to 87 after a youth was martyred in Srinagar due to teargas shell fired by Indian troops.
The 22 panches and sarpanches made the public announcement and sought forgiveness from the people and pledged to take part in the ongoing freedom movement. What compelled them to make this decision? Probably it was their inner conscious, which at some point in life forces one to choose right over wrong thus fortifying the concept of being human.
And probably because of this same inner conscious the Ex- Indian Army Major Dinesh Tiwari was also compelled to scribe his feelings for as to why Kashmir still burns at the hands of India. He wrote it on his Facebook wall and it is so true to heart as well as quite heartbreaking. Especially when he feels the agony of not loving Kashmiries for who they are. When asked by a little Kashmiri boy if Dinesh was a Kashmiri too this is what he replied, “No, my friend, I am not a Kashmiri. I could not be one. I was not expected to be one. Therefore, I was not educated to be one. I was not trained to be one.
And I do not love you and your Kashmir. I could not. I was not expected to. I was not educated to. I was not trained to.”

This is what Dinesh Tiwari wrote and I couldn’t resist sharing it.
“I have been to Kashmir. No, not as a tourist.
I have lived there. I have worked there.
I was part of the heavy military instrument of the Indian State in the paradise, guarding it from the heaven dwellers themselves. And some mischievous neighbors too.
As a 21 year old, with the might of one of the biggest militaries in the world behind me and its command pinned on my shoulders, its determination manifested in the AK in my hand, I have roamed the towns and villages with authority which none of the Burhan Wanis or Bhatts or Wazirs or Bhans or Wattals or anybody else whose land it was, would have dared to.
Ironically, as a Citizen of Nepal, serving in the Indian Army, I was a bundle of contradictions myself.
When I led a group of armed men through a tense neighborhood, I could not help recall the state I was in myself as a teenager, back home in Nepal, angry and frustrated because of the curfew imposed in my hometown, from six in the evening to six in the morning every day for years.
When the Maoist insurgency was at its peak, I was a teenager. I have been frisked, violated, insulted; made to do pushups and squats just because I asked the police man at the check post to repeat himself when he instructed something and I did not properly hear.
There were regular visits to our houses-- by police in uniform, by police without uniform, by a secret police who everyone knew was a secret police; also from unknown people with weapons prominently hidden under wraps, meant to be seen and feared, demanding food, shelter, and money.
I was angry, very angry. I was angry at the then mysterious figure of Prachanda, whose only one picture in combat fatigues was public at that time. I was angry at the ideologue Dr Baburam Bhattarai -- legendary nepal topper (Board First) and PhD from JNU -- who was known to be the brain behind the movement.
I was angry at the people who marched in my town with weapons held high, after they blew away the local bank and the police station.
I was also angry at the policeman who frisked me, dragged me by my arm, threw my bag scattering away all my stuff on the floor and pinned me down to the ground and poked the back of my neck with a pointed object. It wasn't a stick. It was cold and heavy. I did not see it but a chill ran down my spine.
It blew up the anger. I was angry at the government. At the state, which had ignored so many people for so many years that they were ready to fight, and kill and die.
Also, I was angry at myself. Without knowing the reason, without a target, the anger was building up and building pressure and engulfing me.
I was lucky. I had options to flee. I fled at the right time.
When I looked at a beautiful Kashmiri child, who approached me with an innocent admiration and a genuine query, 'You must be Kashmiri, are you Kashmiri?', I was fumbling for an answer.
I would have liked to tell him -- 'Yes, I am.'
I would have loved to say -- 'Yes, we are. We are all Kashmiris. We are all heaven dwellers.'
I would have wanted him to know--'We are here for you. We are your men.'
I would have wanted to give him a smile, a nudge, pinch his cheeks, and ruffle his hair a bit and say, 'Yes, I am a Kashmiri. And I love Kashmir. And you.'
But I did not. Because I did not. I did not love Kashmir. And I did not love that child.
I was not a Kashmiri. And I was not a tourist.
Kashmir, for me was a duty. An assignment, an ardous task that had to be fulfilled to my utmost capability and most importantly, survived.
I did not pack a camera, few romantic novels and Faiz and Gulzar's poetry books before stepping on to the heaven.
I was trained to kill, and armed for it. My literature was bloody.
As a preparation, I was not educated on the beauty the land was but on the contours of terror that prevailed within the landscape.
I did not go through accounts of romantic unions in the scenic backdrops, but brainstormed over hundreds of case studies of bloody and fatal encounters in the terrain.
For me Kashmir was not to be appreciated, but assessed, analysed and acted upon, and survived.
For me the innocent child was not that innocent.
The images of children carrying messages, supplies and even weapons, read in the extensive case studies, immediately cropped up in my mind.
Even before noticing his sparkling beautiful blue eyes, pink apple-like cheeks, and loveliest smile, I had to scan through his whole body to know what was hidden.
Images of children blowing themselves away infront of security forces flashed before me even before I could comprehend the emotions in his voice.
Even before I could think of extending my hand to ruffle his hair, the grip on the AK tightened automatically and my trigger finger was alert.
No, my friend, I am not a Kashmiri. I could not be one. I was not expected to be one. Therefore, I was not educated to be one. I was not trained to be one.
And I do not love you and your Kashmir. I could not. I was not expected to. I was not educated to. I was not trained to.
I was fumbling for an answer. I did not reply.
The child's mother came running, lifted him up and dragged him away hurriedly, slouching a bit, without even looking at me.
Today, he must be Burhan's age. And we don't love him still. And that is one of the reasons why Kashmir burns.



Sunday, August 21, 2016

Pakistani Author Predicted Terror Attacks in the US and Europe

By Sajjad Shaukat

Taking note of the acts of terrorism in  San Bernardino,  Orlando, Paris, Brussels, Munich and Nice, Pakistani author Sajjad Shaukat said in a detailed statement that in his research-based book, “US vs Islamic, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations,” which was first published in 2005, he had already predicted terror attacks in the US and Europe.

Shaukat elaborated that these terror-attacks cannot be seen in isolation, as the same are part of some other related-developments, as he analyzed in the book.

Explaining previous developments, the author wrote that injustices of the New World Order and anti-Muslim policies had already been started by the American former President Bush, (The Senior) when the United States emerged as the sole superpower in the unipolar world after the disintegration of the former Soviet Union.

Mentioning other developments and terror-events such as the manipulation of the 9/11 tragedy by the US President George W. Bush, neoconservatives and Israeli lobbies against the Muslims and Islamic countries, occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq by the US-led Western countries (NATO), their brutal tactics like heavy air bombardment and ground shelling by the sophisticated war machinery, including special military operations and extra-judicial assassinations which killed several innocent Muslims in these countries and other states like Somalia, Yemen etc. where America was indirectly involved, and exploitation of the global war on terror by Israel and India who accelerated state terrorism in the occupied territories of the Palestine and Kashmir, and in response, the guerilla warfare by the Muslim radicals, exchange of firings and suicide attacks on the Western installations and nationals in the occupied countries and in various vulnerable Islamic countries and Philippines, Shaukat has already pointed out that it was due to this faulty strategy which organized the Islamic militant outfits like Al-Qaeda on global and regional level, having links with one another. Such a policy of the US-led state terrorism also resulted into more recruitment by the militant groups who began checking the hegemony of America—inequalities of the US-led world’s status quo like a state actor since the 9/11 tragedy, and counterbalanced the power of the sole superpower in another way.

In the book, the author has also mentioned Guantanamo Bay, Iraq’s Abu Ghraib prison and CIA torture cells which were set up in several Muslim countries and in ships where US secret agencies and military personnel employed various methods of torture on the militants and suspected persons like physical violence and even murder. And without evidence, CIA continued indiscriminate mass round-ups of the suspected Muslim men and women in Afghanistan and Iraq and in some Arab countries.

Shaukat wrote that the US had planned to spark a civil war between Sunnis and Shias. In this respect, he pointed to a report of the Rand Corporation, which was prepared on behalf of the then US Deputy Chief of Staff for Air Force. The report advocated that Sunni-Shia, Arab-non-Arab sectarian and ethnic divides should be exploited to promote the US objectives in the Muslim World.

The report was first implemented in Iraq in 2004 where a chain of Shia-Sunni clashes started. After that experiment, more deadly pattern of sectarian violence was conducted in Pakistan, which still continues. Now, terror attacks on sectarian lines could also be noted in case of Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Syria and in some African countries.

In reaction to perennial state terrorism by the US-led entities, a number of terror-attacks and attempts by the militants like a series of bomb attacks on London’s transport network in 2005, and plane plot in UK in 2006 with liquid bombs, and defeat of Israel in the 2006 war by the Lebanon-based Hezbollah are in consonance with author’s future assessments.

The author also gave valuable suggestions to America and its Western allies, which included solution of Palestinian and Kashmir issues, withdrawal of forces from Afghanistan, reforming of the UNO by giving importance to the General Assembly equally with the Security Council, redressing the grievances of the Third World, particularly those of the Islamic countries. He emphasized stability in Afghanistan, Pakistan and the Middle East, which are necessary for America and its Western partners to promote their regional and global interests. Otherwise, he forecast that if the US new style conflict with the Muslim factions continued, it would assume a dangerous turn in the near future. This war would prolong and America and its allies would have to attack a number of Muslim countries. But, instead of rectifying America’s external policy of Bush-era, President Barack Obama and its Western allies, particularly Europe continued faulty policies such as maintenance of troops in Afghanistan, air strikes on Libya, support to Syrian rebels and the terrorists of the Islamic State group (Also known as Daesh, ISIS, ISIL), including Al-Qaeda’s Al-Nusra Front in fighting against the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Quite contrary to Shaukat’s positive proposals, President Obama also carried on extrajudicial killings of the innocent people through illegal CIA-operated drone attacks in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen etc., and toppled the democratic government of Egypt by backing the military, including support to pro-American dictators of some Arab states like Saudi Arabia who also assist ISIS.

Sajjad Shaukat who thoroughly analyzed secret strategies of the sovereign states in his book, says that If President Bush franchised Al-Qaeda, President Obama and its European allies franchised both Al-Qaeda and ISIS. It was owing to their irresponsible approach or double game that especially ISIS has become more dangerous terrorist group in the world, which conducted terror assaults in Indonesia, Afghanistan, Turkey, Syria, Yemen, Libya and in some other African countries, and has, now, enveloped the US and Europe. While, various terror attacks on Christians in Nigeria and some other African countries by Al-Qaeda and its affiliated groups are also noteworthy.  

After the terror-related incidents which occurred in the US and Europe, Western think-tanks and researchers have, again, been focusing on the causes of the suicide attacks. In this context, the author wrote in the book that besides other causes, the most important cause behind the suicide attacks is that when real brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, parents and the fellows of the Muslims, demanding independence from the US-led neo-imperialism are being killed due to state terrorism, extremism develops in the concerned persons who feel psychologically compelled to commit violent acts and the political objectives they espouse are only a rationalization.  Psychologically speaking, when a person crosses the stage of fear towards non-fear in these adverse circumstances, the previous one can never be achieved and in such a case, even a coward person becomes bold to commit suicide or any violent acts. A number of suicide missions in Iraq (During occupation), Afghanistan, Israel and the Indian-held Kashmir verify this fact. Particularly, some events of women committing suicide also testify this fact. It is because of these reasons that human lives themselves become bombs, supplying the requisites of new style deterrence.

Shaukat who clarified in the book that like other religions, Islam is a religion of peace and Jihad does not permit acts of terrorism or suicide assaults. By updating his observation, he said that just as, the US-led major developed countries misused the global war on terror to impose the agenda of neo-colonialism and neo-imperialism on the Islamic countries, terrorist outfits such as Al-Qaeda, ISIS and their affiliated groups also misinterpret the concept of Jihad to motivate the common Muslims to join their outfits to target Christians, Westerners and especially Americans. He also stated that it is religious fervour, created by Trump against the Muslims and some irresponsible politicians of Europe, which will further endanger the world in general and the US and Europe in particular.  

Shaukat already opined that the states and these stateless warriors could cause a major war in the Middle East and South Asia by exploiting the terrorism phenomena. This actually happened when there was likelihood of war between Pakistan and India, after the Mumbai terror-attacks of 2008. Similarly, besides previous tension between Syria and Israel, present one between Russian-led coalition of Iran, Iraq, Syrian forces, Hezbollah and the US-led West, especially Europe are also in accordance with author’s future assessments, as he also predicted that the Islamic radical factions have the power to disturb a regional balance in their favour and to give a setback to the peace processes. On the other hand, state actors like Israel and India who are being encouraged by the double standards of America and Europe also manipulate the opportunity to fulfill their selfish interests, as noted in case of Syrian war and Kashmir.

The author indicated that equation of wars of liberation in Afghanistan, Kashmir and Palestine with terrorism have also resulted in manipulation of the terrorism-phenomena by the militant outfits like ISIS.  

Shaukat wrote that millions of Muslims are living in the US and Europe. Some of extremist Muslims might have been cooperating with the Islamic extremists. In this respect, the twin bombings in the Boston Marathon (USA) which killed three people on April 15, 2013 were carried out by two Chechens who were from Chechnya. Similarly, in a barbaric attack on May 22, 2013, two terrorists killed one British soldier in London with knives. One of the killers was a British citizen of Nigerian origin. Three days after that incident, a French soldier was stabbed in the throat by an unknown terrorist in Paris. French investigations pointed out that these two brutal acts show similarities and connections among the extremist Muslims. Besides some terror assaults such as at US military facilities in Chattanooga by a Kuwaiti citizen Abdulazeez, on July 16, 2015 are notable, as ISIL claimed responsibility for these terror attacks.

Citing references of history of Europe and secret strategies of the power-theorists like Machiavelli, Hobbes, Morgenthau and Henry Kissinger, which are being followed by the US and Western countries, Shaukat said in light of his book that terrorism-related incidents of San Bernardino,  Orlando, Paris, Brussels, Munich and Nice were false flag operations, because some state actors like Israel and America and their intelligence agencies such as CIA and particularly Israeli Mossad were in collaboration with the ISIS which has, itself, used home-grown Muslim extremists of America and Europe in arranging these terror assaults. Washington and Tel Aviv wanted to obtain several aims through these false flag terrorist attacks. In this context, they wanted to keep the US and Europe united against Russian-led coalition in relation to Syrian war, to divert the attention of American and European public from the prolonged war in Afghanistan, to avoid the two-state solution of the Israeli-Palestinian issue—exaggeration of the so-called Islamophobia, persecution of the Muslims in their countries and to ensure the pro-Israeli and pro-Indian Donald J. Trump-the Republican presidential nominee’s success in the  coming presidential elections of the United States, as he is well-known for his anti-Muslim rhetoric and in manipulation of the terror incidents which occurred in America and Europe.

The author mentioned that preplanned scheme of the CIA-Mossad is also inspiring the Christians and Muslims against each other. Some terror-related assaults in America and Europe are the result of self-resentment, conducted by the individuals, having no links with the ISIL. For example, the teenager Ali David Sonboly who killed 9 people in Munich had no connection with the ISIS. Police investigation revealed that he was a mentally troubled person and police also discovered extremist material, linked to the attack by Andres Behring Brevik, the white supremacist who murdered 77 persons in Norway in 2011. Likewise, an Afghan refugee attacked people with an ax-and-knife in a German train near Bavarian city of Wuerzburg, leaving five people severely injured. Although, the ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack on the German train, yet the German authorities disclosed, “It appears the 17-year-old Afghan asylum seeker who was killed by police have self-radicalized and had no direct link to the extremists.” Regarding mass shooting at the night gay club of Orlando, even, President Obama stated on June 12, 2016, “Federal authorities had made no definitive judgement on the killer’s motivation, and whether he was inspired by or directed by Islamic State or other terrorist groups. Obama made it clear by elaborating, “Shooting was the result of Mateen’s personal resentment in relation to the gay club.”

On July 25, this year, a priest has been killed in an attack by two armed men in a church of France near the city of Rouen. ISIL claimed responsibility for the assault. However, CIA and Mossad are radicalizing the Christians and the Muslims. In one way or the other, all these events were false flag terror attacks.

Nevertheless, the author added that all these terror-events verified his future observations. In this connection, Shaukat has also used the term of “intermixing of races” for the Western multicultural societies and explained that in America and Europe, it provides a successful cover to the Muslim activists, including CIA and Mossad in keeping them anonymous.

Sajjad Shaukat remarked that when Iraq-based ISIS which proclaimed a worldwide caliphate by its leader Abu Baker al-Baghdadi on June 29, 2014, its criminal actions had widely been criticized in the world, with many Islamic communities judging the group to be unrepresentative of Islam. One of ISIS’s goals has been to establish a radical Sunni Islamic state in Iraq and Syria Jordan, Palestine etc. (Levant region). It has been used by the US and Israel for distorting the image of Islam and for inciting the feelings of Western Christians and Kurds against the Muslims. For the purpose, like Al-Qaeda, it is widely known for its violent acts and propaganda which includes Internet videos of beheadings etc. Nonetheless, besides some Islamic countries, a majority of the religious extremists (Muslims) from the Western World joined the ISIS. In this regard, oblivion on the part of the West—especially the US and Europe about ISIS recruits from their countries is questionable.

The author pointed out that despite their vast resources, technical intelligence e.g. satellites, unmanned aerial vehicles and human intelligence—extraordinary long-range aerial military capacity, the ability to strike at will from the space at any point on the globe, America and its major European allies, including their secret agencies failed in destroying the networks of ISIS and Al Qaeda, and in stopping acts of sabotage in the US and Europe.

He wrote in the book that line between official and non-official terrorism has been blurred in this ‘different war,’ owing to the US-led major European countries who consider themselves rational actors, but take the weak-small Muslim countries as irrational actors, while these big states act upon irrational policies.

The author has warned in the last chapter of the book that if new system for world peace is not being evolved by reconciling realism (power factor) with idealism by taking cognizance of the collective interests of humanity—big and small states, without discrimination, and if poverty is not being eliminated in the poor countries, the international community could divide on religious lines, culminating into clash of civilizations. He indicated that in case, Israeli-Palestinian issue and Kashmir dispute remain unsettled due to the silence of America and its major European partners, and NATO states keep presence in Afghanistan, these countries would remain breeding grounds of militants. He has also proposed to deploy UN forces between Israeli and Palestinian territories and to set up no-fly zone. But Israeli-led America did not agree. In light of analysis, mentioned in the book, Shaukat also emphasized on the solution of the Syrian crisis.

In the book, Shaukat has said that after the failure of power factor by America and its allies, more state terrorism would result into more terrorism led by the militant outfits. He has predicted more terror attacks in the US and Europe by opining that if America and its Western allies, especially European partners continued their present irresponsible policies in connection with Syria, Afghanistan, Kashmir, Palestine, ISIS etc.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of this book.

Email: sajjad_logic_pak@hotmail.com

Courtesy  Veterans Today.  


National Action Plan & Madaris Reforms

By Sajjad Shaukat

The National Action Plan (NAP) is essential part of Pakistan’s war against terrorism, as it has co-relationship with the military operation Zarb-i-Azb against the militants, including other related-issues like Madaris (Religious seminaries) which need registration and reforms.

In this regard, a high level security meeting was held at the GHQ, presided by the Army Chief General Raheel Sharif on August 12, this year to review progress of Zarb-e-Azb and the NAP. According to the reliable sources the Pakistan Army is unhappy with the progress on the National Action Plan, as the civil authorities have not made any progress on eight of the 20 NAP points. The sources said that Gen. Raheel Sharif took notice of the negative statements and criticism by some politicians and Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in a meeting at Prime Minister’s House.

In this context, a statement of the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) pointed out that Gen. Raheel Sharif stated that NAP was “key to achieving the national objectives and a lack of progress on it was affecting the consolidation phase of the Operation Zarb-e-Azb…unless all prongs deliver meaningfully and all inadequacies are addressed, remnants of terrorism will continue to simmer and long-term peace and stability will remain a distant dream…we have come a long way in fighting this war…the nation has been standing by its security forces…any distracting and inciting comments and theories by some quarters are unhelpful and undermining the overall national effort.”  

It is mentionable that taking cognizance of the Quetta terror suicide bombing in which 71 people were killed and scores injured, after a meeting chaired by Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and participated by the civil-military top officials, including the DG, of Inter-Services Intelligence agency in connection with the implementation of the NAP and ongoing counterterrorism operations, on August 11, 2016, the political and military leadership agreed to set up a taskforce to monitor the implementation of the National Action Plan.

It is notable that besides other important points, the National Action Plan also includes effective steps against religious persecution, registration and regulation of Madaris by the supervision of the government. The government, under National Action Plan against extremism and terrorism, had announced to register all of Madaris in Pakistan and introduce reforms in their syllabus on priority-basis. But still, there is slow implementation of this policy. In the country, there are more than 24,000 Madaris (seminaries).

As part of National Action Plan, the government has recently made an agreement with Ittehad Tanzeemul Madaris, the administrative body of Madaris for implementation of Madarisreforms, registration   and   regulations. Besides   countering   religious   extremism and sectarian   hate, government’s efforts in this regard are aimed at modernization of curriculum of Madaris to bring them at par with mainstream educational system. However, unfortunately, such accords have yielded no positive outcome in the past and this critical national issue has unnecessarily been made controversial by the people with vested interests.
It is expected that this time the government will remove impediments for implementation of reforms and Ittehad Tanzeemul Madaris will not be allowed to cause unnecessary delays in the process. The objectives of the reforms are to qualitatively improve the standards of education system with better control and management oversight. The demand and need for Madaris reforms have always been felt by the religious scholars—also Dars-e-Nizami was itself prepared as a reformative measure 300 years ago. It is outdated and it cannot meet the challenges of modern education system. The scientific subjects and vocational/technical training must be integrated with the religious curriculum of Madaris to uplift in standards. As Madaris are catering the educational needs of 3.5 million students, according to some estimates, the modernization of their curriculum on scientific lines will be beneficial for everyone including the administrative bodies of Madaris. 

To provoke the individuals with religious bent of mind against government’s efforts to reform Madaris, extremist outfits make false propaganda that Madaris and Ulema (Religious scholars) are under threat in Pakistan. As a matter of fact, almost 32,000 Salafi, Wahabi, Barelvi, Deobandi, Ahl-e-Hadith and Shia registered Madaris are freely operating in the country. 

As regards religious seminaries, in 2015, in a meeting of military, political and religious seminaries, all the participants reached a mutual consensus. While assuring unconditional support to National Action Plan, representatives of Madaris, Ulema said that culprits and black sheep in religious institutes should be dealt with iron hands. They agreed that “Pakistan is our motherland. We on our own have to protect its integrity.” They also agreed for reforms in the religious schools through introduction of new curriculum, registration, and funding process.

Earlier, the chief ministers agreed to all the proposals put forth by the interior minister regarding important issues including regularization of the affairs of Madaris and NGOs.

Meanwhile, according to online sources, in 2015, the Police had checked documents of 2,994 students of 11 Madaris in Karachi and their administration had been ordered to ban entry of any student who is without documents, and arrested several proclaimed offenders and court absconders, during a search operation of various hotels, inns and guest houses. Similar action was also taken in Islamabad and some other parts of the country.

Particularly, the religious scholars and seminaries should play their role in discouraging sectarianism and terrorism and a campaign to eliminate such tendencies should be launched by developing a counter narrative.

Now, Pakistan is in the state of new warfare, being waged by the Armed Forces and intelligence agencies against terrorists. This different war against terrorism demands not only cooperation of the people with the security agencies, but also a selfless national unity among our rulers and leaders of other political parties including Ulema. Hence, all segments of nation must be on one page, which is necessary to implement the National Action Plan which itself is essential to win this war against terrorism.
At this critical hour, public and Madaris administrations must cooperate with the government for Madaris   reforms,   registration and government should also ensure quick completion of this process.
Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations
Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com