National interest should reign supreme

National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme

Wars perpetuate violence

Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence

Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping

Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping

By Sajjad Shaukat

Every year, International Day of United Nations (UN) Peacekeepers is celebrated on May 29 to pay tribute to all those who served in the UN peacekeeping operations and to honor the memory of those who lost their lives in the cause of peace. This very day also reminds Pakistan Armed Forces role in UN peacekeeping measures, during war and peace time. 

Pakistan Armed Forces are considered the best organized institution, and are highly respected in the country, as since the founding of Pakistan, its military has played a key role in holding the state together, promoting a feeling of nationhood and providing a bastion of selfless service.

Since its creation, Pakistan has played a significant role as UN member, in bringing peace through active diplomatic, moral and material support in various regions of the world. Today, Pakistan’s position as one of the largest troop contributing country in the world with one of the highest peacekeepers’ casualty figure is testimony to its commitment and endeavours towards promoting the noble cause of global peace. It is not easy to achieve peace in world’s conflict ridden areas. But Pakistan Army’s history is replete with sacrifices, services to humanity and promoting collective security for human prosperity.

In this regard, Pakistan is a big player in UN peacekeeping forces. Pakistan joined the United Nations on September 30, 1947. Since 1960, it has been actively involved in most of the UN peacekeeping missions. Major contributions of Pakistan Army are in Congo, Liberia Somalia, Ivory Coast, Western Sahara, Sierra Leone, Bosnia, Kosovo, Georgia, East Timor Haiti etc. Even, at present, more than 8200 troops of Pakistan Army are engaged in different peacekeeping missions across various volatile countries.

The performance of Pakistani peacekeepers has been recognized worldwide by several world leaders including those of the UN. An undeniable professional standing of Pakistani forces has made them the passion of every special representative of Secretary General and Force Commander in each of UN peacekeeping operations. In this respect, Pakistan’s dedication towards UN has been acknowledged by UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon who himself visited Pakistan and inaugurated the Center for International Peace and Stability (CIPS) on 13 August 2013 and praised Pakistan’s efforts in UN peacekeeping missions.

However, Pakistan has participated in 41 UN missions in 23 states where total 142,542 Pakistani personnel engaged, taking start from UN Congo Operation in 1960. Pak army delivered its services there, and contributed in ordnance, transport and staff. It is still present in Congo, and provided a Battalion Group comprising one infantry battalion and supporting elements.

For maintaining and monitoring ceasefire during transition of West Irian from Dutch rule to Indonesians, Pakistan contributed 1500 infantry troops from October 3, 1962 to April 30, 1963. In a rare acknowledgement of excellent role done, Chinese Premier Chou-En-Lai had said, “The only example in United Nation’s history, when United Nations force had gone in…performed its role honestly and came out, was Pakistan’s military contingent to Indonesia.”

Besides, Pakistan’s contribution was in United Nations Yemen Observer Mission (UNYOM) as a military observer from January to September 1964. Yemen entered into a state of civil war in 1962. To ensure that this conflict did not escalate into global incident, the UN set up its Yemen Observation Mission. And, United Nations Transition Assistance Group in Namibia (UNTAG) was established to assist the special representative of the UN Secretary General to ensure the early independence of Namibia through free and fair elections, and to carry out a number of other duties. For the purpose, 20 military observers from Pak Army performed their duties from April 1, 1989 to March 21, 1990 in Namibia.

Notably, Pak Army played a positive role in the Middle East, and was on forefront for peace restoration. United Nations Iraq-Kuwait Observer Mission (UNIKOM) was set up in April 1991, following the forced withdrawal of Iraqi forces from Kuwait. Its task was to monitor the demilitarized zone along the Iraq-Kuwait border and deter border violations. Pakistani forces which helped continuing their services there from April 1991 to 2003 were assigned the most difficult area in the north of Kuwait city—reclamation of Bubiyan Island was also entrusted to them. The operation was carried out by a task force of Pakistan Army Engineers. The professionalism and dedication displayed by this force was praised at international level.

While, inside the United Nations Transitional Authority on Cambodia (UNTAC), the Pakistan’s military forces carried out peacekeeping operations in the most thorny and remote areas during the period-May 1992 to August 1993. They overcame enormous logistic and operational problems, and proved their courage and determination by defending themselves and those for whom they were sent. Coping with the odds, they handled crisis after crisis and persuaded the warring factions to lay down their arms.

And, on the request of the UN in Latin America under the United Nations Mission in Haiti (UNMIH), Pakistan provided one infantry battalion, ‘PAKBAT’ which arrived in Haiti in March 1995 and was deployed in Cape Haitien—the area faced extremely volatile security situation and was also the hotbed of political agitation. ‘PAKBAT’ discharged its duties with an extensive patrolling program, covering various regions there.

Nevertheless, Pakistan’s army has worked in difficult terrains and situations for the global peace. Now, inside the country, although Pakistan Armed Forces are facing a tough situation in wake of war against terrorism, yet they are contributing to global peace and prosperity; having still a large number of their presence in various parts of the world.

Now, the major powers must abandon their false propaganda against Pakistan and its Armed Forces, as the latter did more in response of international demand of world peace.

Nonetheless, in pursuance of Pakistan Army’s unwavering commitment towards international peace, 130 Pakistani soldiers have sacrificed their lives. In this connection, Pakistan Armed Forces’ positive role in the UN peacekeeping measures reflects Pakistan’s desire to see the principles of human dignity, freedom and self-determination.

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com

May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power

May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power

By Sajjad Shaukat

With national zeal and fervour in different parts of the country, Youm-e-Takbeer (The day of greatness) is celebrated every year on May 28 as a national day to mark the conduction of nuclear tests when on the very day in 1998; Pakistan became the first Muslim and the 7th nuclear power in the world.

While showing aggressive designs, on May 11, 1998, the then Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee surprised the international community by announcing that India has conducted 3 nuclear tests earlier that day. On May 13, 1998, India conducted two more nuclear tests.

However, both the neighboring countries have waged three wars, especially on the issue of the Indian occupied Kashmir, so Pakistan’s arch rival compelled Islamabad to follow the suit. In this regard, it took only 17 days for Pakistan to successfully carry out its five nuclear tests which were done on May 28 and the sixth one on May 1998, at Chaghi in Balochistan in response to five nuclear explosions detonated by India, threatening the security of Pakistan. For the purpose, about five thousands scientists including Dr Samarmand Mubarik and especially Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan had worked day and night and made the defence of the country impregnable.

As regards Pakistan’s atomic experiments, renowned journalist, Majid Nizami said, “Pakistan faced tremendous pressure from India after it detonated five nuclear devices and America in this scenario also did not want Pakistan to become a nuclear power. US President Clinton telephoned the Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif five times besides offering him billions of dollars to refrain him from nuclear tests. In this perspective, he further stated, Nawaz was receiving opinion from different sections of society, and in the same connection, he also convened a meeting of the editors wherein he (Majid Nizami) also gave the input.”

New Delhi’s war-mongering strategy against Pakistan could be judged from the fact that in 1974 India conducted first nuclear test at Pokhran Range in Rajhistan so as to pressurise Islamabad.

It is mentionable that when ZulfikarAli Bhutto, (The late) came to power, he paid much attention to the nuclear programme of Pakistan, as he knew that India would apply its coercive diplomacy on Islamabad or could attack our country. In this context, while talking on a TV channel on May 28, 2012, Pakistani nuclear scientist Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan appreciated the efforts of former Prime Minister Shaheed ZulfikarAli Bhutto for providing the opportunity to make the nuclear programme of Pakistan successful.

He also made it clear that Pakistan’s nuclear programme was totally indigenous, but acquired materials from some Western countries.

During many crises such as Kargil issue of 1999 and attack on the Indian parliament by the militants in 2001, New Delhi concentrated its troops across the Pakistan’s border, with the intention to attack Pakistan, while raising a series of false allegations against Islamabad. Pakistan was also compelled to deploy its Army along the Pak-India border. But, India did not dare to initiate a war because of Pakistan’s ‘Nukes.’ Similarly, in the past, Indian rulers had intended to implement their doctrine of limited war in Kashmir, but they could not do so owing to our nuclear weapons.

Particularly, in the aftermath of Mumbai terror attacks of 2008, India accused Pakistan’s spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) of supporting the militants. Although Pak diplomats denied Indian self-fabricated story regarding Mumbai catastrophe, but New Delhi adopted a threatening posture against Islamabad. It one again deployed its troops across the Pakistani border. Again, Islamabad also concentrated its military in order to give a matching response to India.

Notably, when US special forces killed Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan on May 2, 2011 in violation of Pak sovereignty—though Islamabad had repeatedly made it clear that its government and intelligence agencies did not know anything about Bin Laden’s whereabouts including any official involvement regarding the 26/11 Mumbai catastrophe, but, New Delhi continued its aggressive style which could be judged from the statement of Indian Army Chief Gen. VK Singh who claimed on May 4, 2011 that if situation arose, the Indian defence forces were competent to undertake a US-like operation inside Pakistan, which killed Al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden. Indian army’s Northern Command chief also expressed similar thought.

In this respect, Indian top civil and defence officials clearly said that their country could conduct a US-type military operation or surgical strikes inside Pakistan.

Nevertheless, in the aftermath of Mumbai attack, India left no stone unturned in frightening Pakistan through a prospective invasion. Violation of Pakistan’s air space by New Delhi had created an alarming situation, as Islamabad had also taken defensive steps in response to meet any aggression or surgical strikes by India. Situation was so critical that Pakistan started moving thousands of military troops from the Afghan border and the tribal areas to its border with India. But, India failed in implementing its plans of any military action or aerial strikes on Pakistan due to the fact that the latter also possesses nuclear arsenal which could destroy whole of India.

It is noteworthy that America dropped atomic bombs on Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as Tokyo had no such devices to retaliate. After the World War 11, nuclear weapons were never used. These were only employed as a strategic threat. During the heightened days of the Cold War, many crises arose in Suez Canal, Korea, Cuba and Vietnam when the US and the former Soviet Union were willing to use atomic weapons, but they stopped because of the fear of nuclear war which could culminate in the elimination of both the super powers. It was due to the concept of ‘mutually assured destruction’ that the two rivals preferred to resolve their differences through diplomacy.

Political strategists agree that deterrence is a psychological concept that aims to affect an opponent’s perceptions. In nuclear deterrence weapons are less usable as their threat is enough in deterring an enemy that intends to use its armed might.

While both the neighbouring adversaries are nuclear powers, Indians should not ignore the principles of deterrence, popularly known as balance of terror.

In these terms, India is badly mistaken, if it overestimates its own power and underestimates Pakistan’s power. As our country lacks conventional weapons vis-à-vis India, so it will have to use atomic devices during a prolonged conflict which would result into national suicide of the two countries. So India may apply its blackmailing diplomacy on the non-atomic states of South Asia in exerting psychological pressure, but it is useless in case of Pakistan whose deterrence is credible, making its defence invincible, as it possesses a variety of nuclear weapons and missiles which could be used against India as the last option, if the latter attacked our country.

Moreover, it is due to atomic bombs that Islamabad can talk to New Delhi with honour and dignity, discouraging India from casting an evil eye on our motherland.

Furthermore, as Pakistan is the only declared nuclear country in the Islamic World, hence, it has become special target of some western top officials and media persons who continue their propaganda against Pakistan’s nuclear programme. They have especially hired the services of media anchors and writers who work on their payroll and have been creating doubts about the safety and security of Pakistan’s atomic weapons and nuclear plants. Particularly, in 2009 when the heavily-armed Taliban entered Swat, Dir and Buner, US high officials and their media had exaggerated the ‘Talibinisation’ of whole Pakistan, while showing concerns about Pakistan’s atomic arms. In that regard, the then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had warned that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons could fall into the hands of terrorists. But, when Pakistan’s armed forces ejected the Taliban insurgents out of these areas by breaking their backbone, She started appreciating the capabilities of Pakistan Armed Forces.

Similarly, when terrorists had attacked on Pakistan’s Naval Airbase in Karachi on May 23, 2011, US-led some western countries including India and Israel exploited the situation through disinformation about the security of Pak nukes. And, terrorists’ assault on Kamra Base was successfully foiled by the personnel of Pakistan Air Force, but, a baseless report, published in the New York Times had indicated that suspected militants attacked a major Pakistani Air Force base where some of the country’s nuclear weapons were considered to be stored in the early hours of the militants’ attack. The ex-US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta also stated day, “There is a danger of nuclear weapons of Pakistan, falling into hands of terrorists.”

Undoubtedly, Pakistan’s nuclear assets are in safe hands-well-protected and are under tight security arrangements, having the best command and control system.

Nonetheless, May 28 is celebrated as Youm-e-Takbeer by various political parties and social organizations including general masses with a pledge to make Pakistan a stronger country, militarily and economically, among the comity of nations. No doubt, on this very day of 1998, Pakistan became nuclear power.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com

National interest should reign supreme

National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme

Wars perpetuate violence

Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence

Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping

Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping

By Sajjad Shaukat

Every year, International Day of United Nations (UN) Peacekeepers is celebrated on May 29 to pay tribute to all those who served in the UN peacekeeping operations and to honor the memory of those who lost their lives in the cause of peace. This very day also reminds Pakistan Armed Forces role in UN peacekeeping measures, during war and peace time. 

Pakistan Armed Forces are considered the best organized institution, and are highly respected in the country, as since the founding of Pakistan, its military has played a key role in holding the state together, promoting a feeling of nationhood and providing a bastion of selfless service.

Since its creation, Pakistan has played a significant role as UN member, in bringing peace through active diplomatic, moral and material support in various regions of the world. Today, Pakistan’s position as one of the largest troop contributing country in the world with one of the highest peacekeepers’ casualty figure is testimony to its commitment and endeavours towards promoting the noble cause of global peace. It is not easy to achieve peace in world’s conflict ridden areas. But Pakistan Army’s history is replete with sacrifices, services to humanity and promoting collective security for human prosperity.

In this regard, Pakistan is a big player in UN peacekeeping forces. Pakistan joined the United Nations on September 30, 1947. Since 1960, it has been actively involved in most of the UN peacekeeping missions. Major contributions of Pakistan Army are in Congo, Liberia Somalia, Ivory Coast, Western Sahara, Sierra Leone, Bosnia, Kosovo, Georgia, East Timor Haiti etc. Even, at present, more than 8200 troops of Pakistan Army are engaged in different peacekeeping missions across various volatile countries.

The performance of Pakistani peacekeepers has been recognized worldwide by several world leaders including those of the UN. An undeniable professional standing of Pakistani forces has made them the passion of every special representative of Secretary General and Force Commander in each of UN peacekeeping operations. In this respect, Pakistan’s dedication towards UN has been acknowledged by UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon who himself visited Pakistan and inaugurated the Center for International Peace and Stability (CIPS) on 13 August 2013 and praised Pakistan’s efforts in UN peacekeeping missions.

However, Pakistan has participated in 41 UN missions in 23 states where total 142,542 Pakistani personnel engaged, taking start from UN Congo Operation in 1960. Pak army delivered its services there, and contributed in ordnance, transport and staff. It is still present in Congo, and provided a Battalion Group comprising one infantry battalion and supporting elements.

For maintaining and monitoring ceasefire during transition of West Irian from Dutch rule to Indonesians, Pakistan contributed 1500 infantry troops from October 3, 1962 to April 30, 1963. In a rare acknowledgement of excellent role done, Chinese Premier Chou-En-Lai had said, “The only example in United Nation’s history, when United Nations force had gone in…performed its role honestly and came out, was Pakistan’s military contingent to Indonesia.”

Besides, Pakistan’s contribution was in United Nations Yemen Observer Mission (UNYOM) as a military observer from January to September 1964. Yemen entered into a state of civil war in 1962. To ensure that this conflict did not escalate into global incident, the UN set up its Yemen Observation Mission. And, United Nations Transition Assistance Group in Namibia (UNTAG) was established to assist the special representative of the UN Secretary General to ensure the early independence of Namibia through free and fair elections, and to carry out a number of other duties. For the purpose, 20 military observers from Pak Army performed their duties from April 1, 1989 to March 21, 1990 in Namibia.

Notably, Pak Army played a positive role in the Middle East, and was on forefront for peace restoration. United Nations Iraq-Kuwait Observer Mission (UNIKOM) was set up in April 1991, following the forced withdrawal of Iraqi forces from Kuwait. Its task was to monitor the demilitarized zone along the Iraq-Kuwait border and deter border violations. Pakistani forces which helped continuing their services there from April 1991 to 2003 were assigned the most difficult area in the north of Kuwait city—reclamation of Bubiyan Island was also entrusted to them. The operation was carried out by a task force of Pakistan Army Engineers. The professionalism and dedication displayed by this force was praised at international level.

While, inside the United Nations Transitional Authority on Cambodia (UNTAC), the Pakistan’s military forces carried out peacekeeping operations in the most thorny and remote areas during the period-May 1992 to August 1993. They overcame enormous logistic and operational problems, and proved their courage and determination by defending themselves and those for whom they were sent. Coping with the odds, they handled crisis after crisis and persuaded the warring factions to lay down their arms.

And, on the request of the UN in Latin America under the United Nations Mission in Haiti (UNMIH), Pakistan provided one infantry battalion, ‘PAKBAT’ which arrived in Haiti in March 1995 and was deployed in Cape Haitien—the area faced extremely volatile security situation and was also the hotbed of political agitation. ‘PAKBAT’ discharged its duties with an extensive patrolling program, covering various regions there.

Nevertheless, Pakistan’s army has worked in difficult terrains and situations for the global peace. Now, inside the country, although Pakistan Armed Forces are facing a tough situation in wake of war against terrorism, yet they are contributing to global peace and prosperity; having still a large number of their presence in various parts of the world.

Now, the major powers must abandon their false propaganda against Pakistan and its Armed Forces, as the latter did more in response of international demand of world peace.

Nonetheless, in pursuance of Pakistan Army’s unwavering commitment towards international peace, 130 Pakistani soldiers have sacrificed their lives. In this connection, Pakistan Armed Forces’ positive role in the UN peacekeeping measures reflects Pakistan’s desire to see the principles of human dignity, freedom and self-determination.

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com

May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power

May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power

By Sajjad Shaukat

With national zeal and fervour in different parts of the country, Youm-e-Takbeer (The day of greatness) is celebrated every year on May 28 as a national day to mark the conduction of nuclear tests when on the very day in 1998; Pakistan became the first Muslim and the 7th nuclear power in the world.

While showing aggressive designs, on May 11, 1998, the then Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee surprised the international community by announcing that India has conducted 3 nuclear tests earlier that day. On May 13, 1998, India conducted two more nuclear tests.

However, both the neighboring countries have waged three wars, especially on the issue of the Indian occupied Kashmir, so Pakistan’s arch rival compelled Islamabad to follow the suit. In this regard, it took only 17 days for Pakistan to successfully carry out its five nuclear tests which were done on May 28 and the sixth one on May 1998, at Chaghi in Balochistan in response to five nuclear explosions detonated by India, threatening the security of Pakistan. For the purpose, about five thousands scientists including Dr Samarmand Mubarik and especially Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan had worked day and night and made the defence of the country impregnable.

As regards Pakistan’s atomic experiments, renowned journalist, Majid Nizami said, “Pakistan faced tremendous pressure from India after it detonated five nuclear devices and America in this scenario also did not want Pakistan to become a nuclear power. US President Clinton telephoned the Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif five times besides offering him billions of dollars to refrain him from nuclear tests. In this perspective, he further stated, Nawaz was receiving opinion from different sections of society, and in the same connection, he also convened a meeting of the editors wherein he (Majid Nizami) also gave the input.”

New Delhi’s war-mongering strategy against Pakistan could be judged from the fact that in 1974 India conducted first nuclear test at Pokhran Range in Rajhistan so as to pressurise Islamabad.

It is mentionable that when ZulfikarAli Bhutto, (The late) came to power, he paid much attention to the nuclear programme of Pakistan, as he knew that India would apply its coercive diplomacy on Islamabad or could attack our country. In this context, while talking on a TV channel on May 28, 2012, Pakistani nuclear scientist Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan appreciated the efforts of former Prime Minister Shaheed ZulfikarAli Bhutto for providing the opportunity to make the nuclear programme of Pakistan successful.

He also made it clear that Pakistan’s nuclear programme was totally indigenous, but acquired materials from some Western countries.

During many crises such as Kargil issue of 1999 and attack on the Indian parliament by the militants in 2001, New Delhi concentrated its troops across the Pakistan’s border, with the intention to attack Pakistan, while raising a series of false allegations against Islamabad. Pakistan was also compelled to deploy its Army along the Pak-India border. But, India did not dare to initiate a war because of Pakistan’s ‘Nukes.’ Similarly, in the past, Indian rulers had intended to implement their doctrine of limited war in Kashmir, but they could not do so owing to our nuclear weapons.

Particularly, in the aftermath of Mumbai terror attacks of 2008, India accused Pakistan’s spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) of supporting the militants. Although Pak diplomats denied Indian self-fabricated story regarding Mumbai catastrophe, but New Delhi adopted a threatening posture against Islamabad. It one again deployed its troops across the Pakistani border. Again, Islamabad also concentrated its military in order to give a matching response to India.

Notably, when US special forces killed Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan on May 2, 2011 in violation of Pak sovereignty—though Islamabad had repeatedly made it clear that its government and intelligence agencies did not know anything about Bin Laden’s whereabouts including any official involvement regarding the 26/11 Mumbai catastrophe, but, New Delhi continued its aggressive style which could be judged from the statement of Indian Army Chief Gen. VK Singh who claimed on May 4, 2011 that if situation arose, the Indian defence forces were competent to undertake a US-like operation inside Pakistan, which killed Al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden. Indian army’s Northern Command chief also expressed similar thought.

In this respect, Indian top civil and defence officials clearly said that their country could conduct a US-type military operation or surgical strikes inside Pakistan.

Nevertheless, in the aftermath of Mumbai attack, India left no stone unturned in frightening Pakistan through a prospective invasion. Violation of Pakistan’s air space by New Delhi had created an alarming situation, as Islamabad had also taken defensive steps in response to meet any aggression or surgical strikes by India. Situation was so critical that Pakistan started moving thousands of military troops from the Afghan border and the tribal areas to its border with India. But, India failed in implementing its plans of any military action or aerial strikes on Pakistan due to the fact that the latter also possesses nuclear arsenal which could destroy whole of India.

It is noteworthy that America dropped atomic bombs on Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as Tokyo had no such devices to retaliate. After the World War 11, nuclear weapons were never used. These were only employed as a strategic threat. During the heightened days of the Cold War, many crises arose in Suez Canal, Korea, Cuba and Vietnam when the US and the former Soviet Union were willing to use atomic weapons, but they stopped because of the fear of nuclear war which could culminate in the elimination of both the super powers. It was due to the concept of ‘mutually assured destruction’ that the two rivals preferred to resolve their differences through diplomacy.

Political strategists agree that deterrence is a psychological concept that aims to affect an opponent’s perceptions. In nuclear deterrence weapons are less usable as their threat is enough in deterring an enemy that intends to use its armed might.

While both the neighbouring adversaries are nuclear powers, Indians should not ignore the principles of deterrence, popularly known as balance of terror.

In these terms, India is badly mistaken, if it overestimates its own power and underestimates Pakistan’s power. As our country lacks conventional weapons vis-à-vis India, so it will have to use atomic devices during a prolonged conflict which would result into national suicide of the two countries. So India may apply its blackmailing diplomacy on the non-atomic states of South Asia in exerting psychological pressure, but it is useless in case of Pakistan whose deterrence is credible, making its defence invincible, as it possesses a variety of nuclear weapons and missiles which could be used against India as the last option, if the latter attacked our country.

Moreover, it is due to atomic bombs that Islamabad can talk to New Delhi with honour and dignity, discouraging India from casting an evil eye on our motherland.

Furthermore, as Pakistan is the only declared nuclear country in the Islamic World, hence, it has become special target of some western top officials and media persons who continue their propaganda against Pakistan’s nuclear programme. They have especially hired the services of media anchors and writers who work on their payroll and have been creating doubts about the safety and security of Pakistan’s atomic weapons and nuclear plants. Particularly, in 2009 when the heavily-armed Taliban entered Swat, Dir and Buner, US high officials and their media had exaggerated the ‘Talibinisation’ of whole Pakistan, while showing concerns about Pakistan’s atomic arms. In that regard, the then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had warned that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons could fall into the hands of terrorists. But, when Pakistan’s armed forces ejected the Taliban insurgents out of these areas by breaking their backbone, She started appreciating the capabilities of Pakistan Armed Forces.

Similarly, when terrorists had attacked on Pakistan’s Naval Airbase in Karachi on May 23, 2011, US-led some western countries including India and Israel exploited the situation through disinformation about the security of Pak nukes. And, terrorists’ assault on Kamra Base was successfully foiled by the personnel of Pakistan Air Force, but, a baseless report, published in the New York Times had indicated that suspected militants attacked a major Pakistani Air Force base where some of the country’s nuclear weapons were considered to be stored in the early hours of the militants’ attack. The ex-US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta also stated day, “There is a danger of nuclear weapons of Pakistan, falling into hands of terrorists.”

Undoubtedly, Pakistan’s nuclear assets are in safe hands-well-protected and are under tight security arrangements, having the best command and control system.

Nonetheless, May 28 is celebrated as Youm-e-Takbeer by various political parties and social organizations including general masses with a pledge to make Pakistan a stronger country, militarily and economically, among the comity of nations. No doubt, on this very day of 1998, Pakistan became nuclear power.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com

National interest should reign supreme

National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme

Wars perpetuate violence

Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence

Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping

Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping

By Sajjad Shaukat

Every year, International Day of United Nations (UN) Peacekeepers is celebrated on May 29 to pay tribute to all those who served in the UN peacekeeping operations and to honor the memory of those who lost their lives in the cause of peace. This very day also reminds Pakistan Armed Forces role in UN peacekeeping measures, during war and peace time. 

Pakistan Armed Forces are considered the best organized institution, and are highly respected in the country, as since the founding of Pakistan, its military has played a key role in holding the state together, promoting a feeling of nationhood and providing a bastion of selfless service.

Since its creation, Pakistan has played a significant role as UN member, in bringing peace through active diplomatic, moral and material support in various regions of the world. Today, Pakistan’s position as one of the largest troop contributing country in the world with one of the highest peacekeepers’ casualty figure is testimony to its commitment and endeavours towards promoting the noble cause of global peace. It is not easy to achieve peace in world’s conflict ridden areas. But Pakistan Army’s history is replete with sacrifices, services to humanity and promoting collective security for human prosperity.

In this regard, Pakistan is a big player in UN peacekeeping forces. Pakistan joined the United Nations on September 30, 1947. Since 1960, it has been actively involved in most of the UN peacekeeping missions. Major contributions of Pakistan Army are in Congo, Liberia Somalia, Ivory Coast, Western Sahara, Sierra Leone, Bosnia, Kosovo, Georgia, East Timor Haiti etc. Even, at present, more than 8200 troops of Pakistan Army are engaged in different peacekeeping missions across various volatile countries.

The performance of Pakistani peacekeepers has been recognized worldwide by several world leaders including those of the UN. An undeniable professional standing of Pakistani forces has made them the passion of every special representative of Secretary General and Force Commander in each of UN peacekeeping operations. In this respect, Pakistan’s dedication towards UN has been acknowledged by UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon who himself visited Pakistan and inaugurated the Center for International Peace and Stability (CIPS) on 13 August 2013 and praised Pakistan’s efforts in UN peacekeeping missions.

However, Pakistan has participated in 41 UN missions in 23 states where total 142,542 Pakistani personnel engaged, taking start from UN Congo Operation in 1960. Pak army delivered its services there, and contributed in ordnance, transport and staff. It is still present in Congo, and provided a Battalion Group comprising one infantry battalion and supporting elements.

For maintaining and monitoring ceasefire during transition of West Irian from Dutch rule to Indonesians, Pakistan contributed 1500 infantry troops from October 3, 1962 to April 30, 1963. In a rare acknowledgement of excellent role done, Chinese Premier Chou-En-Lai had said, “The only example in United Nation’s history, when United Nations force had gone in…performed its role honestly and came out, was Pakistan’s military contingent to Indonesia.”

Besides, Pakistan’s contribution was in United Nations Yemen Observer Mission (UNYOM) as a military observer from January to September 1964. Yemen entered into a state of civil war in 1962. To ensure that this conflict did not escalate into global incident, the UN set up its Yemen Observation Mission. And, United Nations Transition Assistance Group in Namibia (UNTAG) was established to assist the special representative of the UN Secretary General to ensure the early independence of Namibia through free and fair elections, and to carry out a number of other duties. For the purpose, 20 military observers from Pak Army performed their duties from April 1, 1989 to March 21, 1990 in Namibia.

Notably, Pak Army played a positive role in the Middle East, and was on forefront for peace restoration. United Nations Iraq-Kuwait Observer Mission (UNIKOM) was set up in April 1991, following the forced withdrawal of Iraqi forces from Kuwait. Its task was to monitor the demilitarized zone along the Iraq-Kuwait border and deter border violations. Pakistani forces which helped continuing their services there from April 1991 to 2003 were assigned the most difficult area in the north of Kuwait city—reclamation of Bubiyan Island was also entrusted to them. The operation was carried out by a task force of Pakistan Army Engineers. The professionalism and dedication displayed by this force was praised at international level.

While, inside the United Nations Transitional Authority on Cambodia (UNTAC), the Pakistan’s military forces carried out peacekeeping operations in the most thorny and remote areas during the period-May 1992 to August 1993. They overcame enormous logistic and operational problems, and proved their courage and determination by defending themselves and those for whom they were sent. Coping with the odds, they handled crisis after crisis and persuaded the warring factions to lay down their arms.

And, on the request of the UN in Latin America under the United Nations Mission in Haiti (UNMIH), Pakistan provided one infantry battalion, ‘PAKBAT’ which arrived in Haiti in March 1995 and was deployed in Cape Haitien—the area faced extremely volatile security situation and was also the hotbed of political agitation. ‘PAKBAT’ discharged its duties with an extensive patrolling program, covering various regions there.

Nevertheless, Pakistan’s army has worked in difficult terrains and situations for the global peace. Now, inside the country, although Pakistan Armed Forces are facing a tough situation in wake of war against terrorism, yet they are contributing to global peace and prosperity; having still a large number of their presence in various parts of the world.

Now, the major powers must abandon their false propaganda against Pakistan and its Armed Forces, as the latter did more in response of international demand of world peace.

Nonetheless, in pursuance of Pakistan Army’s unwavering commitment towards international peace, 130 Pakistani soldiers have sacrificed their lives. In this connection, Pakistan Armed Forces’ positive role in the UN peacekeeping measures reflects Pakistan’s desire to see the principles of human dignity, freedom and self-determination.

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com

May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power

May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power

By Sajjad Shaukat

With national zeal and fervour in different parts of the country, Youm-e-Takbeer (The day of greatness) is celebrated every year on May 28 as a national day to mark the conduction of nuclear tests when on the very day in 1998; Pakistan became the first Muslim and the 7th nuclear power in the world.

While showing aggressive designs, on May 11, 1998, the then Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee surprised the international community by announcing that India has conducted 3 nuclear tests earlier that day. On May 13, 1998, India conducted two more nuclear tests.

However, both the neighboring countries have waged three wars, especially on the issue of the Indian occupied Kashmir, so Pakistan’s arch rival compelled Islamabad to follow the suit. In this regard, it took only 17 days for Pakistan to successfully carry out its five nuclear tests which were done on May 28 and the sixth one on May 1998, at Chaghi in Balochistan in response to five nuclear explosions detonated by India, threatening the security of Pakistan. For the purpose, about five thousands scientists including Dr Samarmand Mubarik and especially Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan had worked day and night and made the defence of the country impregnable.

As regards Pakistan’s atomic experiments, renowned journalist, Majid Nizami said, “Pakistan faced tremendous pressure from India after it detonated five nuclear devices and America in this scenario also did not want Pakistan to become a nuclear power. US President Clinton telephoned the Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif five times besides offering him billions of dollars to refrain him from nuclear tests. In this perspective, he further stated, Nawaz was receiving opinion from different sections of society, and in the same connection, he also convened a meeting of the editors wherein he (Majid Nizami) also gave the input.”

New Delhi’s war-mongering strategy against Pakistan could be judged from the fact that in 1974 India conducted first nuclear test at Pokhran Range in Rajhistan so as to pressurise Islamabad.

It is mentionable that when ZulfikarAli Bhutto, (The late) came to power, he paid much attention to the nuclear programme of Pakistan, as he knew that India would apply its coercive diplomacy on Islamabad or could attack our country. In this context, while talking on a TV channel on May 28, 2012, Pakistani nuclear scientist Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan appreciated the efforts of former Prime Minister Shaheed ZulfikarAli Bhutto for providing the opportunity to make the nuclear programme of Pakistan successful.

He also made it clear that Pakistan’s nuclear programme was totally indigenous, but acquired materials from some Western countries.

During many crises such as Kargil issue of 1999 and attack on the Indian parliament by the militants in 2001, New Delhi concentrated its troops across the Pakistan’s border, with the intention to attack Pakistan, while raising a series of false allegations against Islamabad. Pakistan was also compelled to deploy its Army along the Pak-India border. But, India did not dare to initiate a war because of Pakistan’s ‘Nukes.’ Similarly, in the past, Indian rulers had intended to implement their doctrine of limited war in Kashmir, but they could not do so owing to our nuclear weapons.

Particularly, in the aftermath of Mumbai terror attacks of 2008, India accused Pakistan’s spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) of supporting the militants. Although Pak diplomats denied Indian self-fabricated story regarding Mumbai catastrophe, but New Delhi adopted a threatening posture against Islamabad. It one again deployed its troops across the Pakistani border. Again, Islamabad also concentrated its military in order to give a matching response to India.

Notably, when US special forces killed Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan on May 2, 2011 in violation of Pak sovereignty—though Islamabad had repeatedly made it clear that its government and intelligence agencies did not know anything about Bin Laden’s whereabouts including any official involvement regarding the 26/11 Mumbai catastrophe, but, New Delhi continued its aggressive style which could be judged from the statement of Indian Army Chief Gen. VK Singh who claimed on May 4, 2011 that if situation arose, the Indian defence forces were competent to undertake a US-like operation inside Pakistan, which killed Al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden. Indian army’s Northern Command chief also expressed similar thought.

In this respect, Indian top civil and defence officials clearly said that their country could conduct a US-type military operation or surgical strikes inside Pakistan.

Nevertheless, in the aftermath of Mumbai attack, India left no stone unturned in frightening Pakistan through a prospective invasion. Violation of Pakistan’s air space by New Delhi had created an alarming situation, as Islamabad had also taken defensive steps in response to meet any aggression or surgical strikes by India. Situation was so critical that Pakistan started moving thousands of military troops from the Afghan border and the tribal areas to its border with India. But, India failed in implementing its plans of any military action or aerial strikes on Pakistan due to the fact that the latter also possesses nuclear arsenal which could destroy whole of India.

It is noteworthy that America dropped atomic bombs on Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as Tokyo had no such devices to retaliate. After the World War 11, nuclear weapons were never used. These were only employed as a strategic threat. During the heightened days of the Cold War, many crises arose in Suez Canal, Korea, Cuba and Vietnam when the US and the former Soviet Union were willing to use atomic weapons, but they stopped because of the fear of nuclear war which could culminate in the elimination of both the super powers. It was due to the concept of ‘mutually assured destruction’ that the two rivals preferred to resolve their differences through diplomacy.

Political strategists agree that deterrence is a psychological concept that aims to affect an opponent’s perceptions. In nuclear deterrence weapons are less usable as their threat is enough in deterring an enemy that intends to use its armed might.

While both the neighbouring adversaries are nuclear powers, Indians should not ignore the principles of deterrence, popularly known as balance of terror.

In these terms, India is badly mistaken, if it overestimates its own power and underestimates Pakistan’s power. As our country lacks conventional weapons vis-à-vis India, so it will have to use atomic devices during a prolonged conflict which would result into national suicide of the two countries. So India may apply its blackmailing diplomacy on the non-atomic states of South Asia in exerting psychological pressure, but it is useless in case of Pakistan whose deterrence is credible, making its defence invincible, as it possesses a variety of nuclear weapons and missiles which could be used against India as the last option, if the latter attacked our country.

Moreover, it is due to atomic bombs that Islamabad can talk to New Delhi with honour and dignity, discouraging India from casting an evil eye on our motherland.

Furthermore, as Pakistan is the only declared nuclear country in the Islamic World, hence, it has become special target of some western top officials and media persons who continue their propaganda against Pakistan’s nuclear programme. They have especially hired the services of media anchors and writers who work on their payroll and have been creating doubts about the safety and security of Pakistan’s atomic weapons and nuclear plants. Particularly, in 2009 when the heavily-armed Taliban entered Swat, Dir and Buner, US high officials and their media had exaggerated the ‘Talibinisation’ of whole Pakistan, while showing concerns about Pakistan’s atomic arms. In that regard, the then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had warned that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons could fall into the hands of terrorists. But, when Pakistan’s armed forces ejected the Taliban insurgents out of these areas by breaking their backbone, She started appreciating the capabilities of Pakistan Armed Forces.

Similarly, when terrorists had attacked on Pakistan’s Naval Airbase in Karachi on May 23, 2011, US-led some western countries including India and Israel exploited the situation through disinformation about the security of Pak nukes. And, terrorists’ assault on Kamra Base was successfully foiled by the personnel of Pakistan Air Force, but, a baseless report, published in the New York Times had indicated that suspected militants attacked a major Pakistani Air Force base where some of the country’s nuclear weapons were considered to be stored in the early hours of the militants’ attack. The ex-US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta also stated day, “There is a danger of nuclear weapons of Pakistan, falling into hands of terrorists.”

Undoubtedly, Pakistan’s nuclear assets are in safe hands-well-protected and are under tight security arrangements, having the best command and control system.

Nonetheless, May 28 is celebrated as Youm-e-Takbeer by various political parties and social organizations including general masses with a pledge to make Pakistan a stronger country, militarily and economically, among the comity of nations. No doubt, on this very day of 1998, Pakistan became nuclear power.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com

National interest should reign supreme

National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme
National interest should reign supreme

Wars perpetuate violence

Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence
Wars perpetuate violence

Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping

Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping
Pakistan Armed Forces’ Role in UN Peacekeeping

By Sajjad Shaukat

Every year, International Day of United Nations (UN) Peacekeepers is celebrated on May 29 to pay tribute to all those who served in the UN peacekeeping operations and to honor the memory of those who lost their lives in the cause of peace. This very day also reminds Pakistan Armed Forces role in UN peacekeeping measures, during war and peace time. 

Pakistan Armed Forces are considered the best organized institution, and are highly respected in the country, as since the founding of Pakistan, its military has played a key role in holding the state together, promoting a feeling of nationhood and providing a bastion of selfless service.

Since its creation, Pakistan has played a significant role as UN member, in bringing peace through active diplomatic, moral and material support in various regions of the world. Today, Pakistan’s position as one of the largest troop contributing country in the world with one of the highest peacekeepers’ casualty figure is testimony to its commitment and endeavours towards promoting the noble cause of global peace. It is not easy to achieve peace in world’s conflict ridden areas. But Pakistan Army’s history is replete with sacrifices, services to humanity and promoting collective security for human prosperity.

In this regard, Pakistan is a big player in UN peacekeeping forces. Pakistan joined the United Nations on September 30, 1947. Since 1960, it has been actively involved in most of the UN peacekeeping missions. Major contributions of Pakistan Army are in Congo, Liberia Somalia, Ivory Coast, Western Sahara, Sierra Leone, Bosnia, Kosovo, Georgia, East Timor Haiti etc. Even, at present, more than 8200 troops of Pakistan Army are engaged in different peacekeeping missions across various volatile countries.

The performance of Pakistani peacekeepers has been recognized worldwide by several world leaders including those of the UN. An undeniable professional standing of Pakistani forces has made them the passion of every special representative of Secretary General and Force Commander in each of UN peacekeeping operations. In this respect, Pakistan’s dedication towards UN has been acknowledged by UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon who himself visited Pakistan and inaugurated the Center for International Peace and Stability (CIPS) on 13 August 2013 and praised Pakistan’s efforts in UN peacekeeping missions.

However, Pakistan has participated in 41 UN missions in 23 states where total 142,542 Pakistani personnel engaged, taking start from UN Congo Operation in 1960. Pak army delivered its services there, and contributed in ordnance, transport and staff. It is still present in Congo, and provided a Battalion Group comprising one infantry battalion and supporting elements.

For maintaining and monitoring ceasefire during transition of West Irian from Dutch rule to Indonesians, Pakistan contributed 1500 infantry troops from October 3, 1962 to April 30, 1963. In a rare acknowledgement of excellent role done, Chinese Premier Chou-En-Lai had said, “The only example in United Nation’s history, when United Nations force had gone in…performed its role honestly and came out, was Pakistan’s military contingent to Indonesia.”

Besides, Pakistan’s contribution was in United Nations Yemen Observer Mission (UNYOM) as a military observer from January to September 1964. Yemen entered into a state of civil war in 1962. To ensure that this conflict did not escalate into global incident, the UN set up its Yemen Observation Mission. And, United Nations Transition Assistance Group in Namibia (UNTAG) was established to assist the special representative of the UN Secretary General to ensure the early independence of Namibia through free and fair elections, and to carry out a number of other duties. For the purpose, 20 military observers from Pak Army performed their duties from April 1, 1989 to March 21, 1990 in Namibia.

Notably, Pak Army played a positive role in the Middle East, and was on forefront for peace restoration. United Nations Iraq-Kuwait Observer Mission (UNIKOM) was set up in April 1991, following the forced withdrawal of Iraqi forces from Kuwait. Its task was to monitor the demilitarized zone along the Iraq-Kuwait border and deter border violations. Pakistani forces which helped continuing their services there from April 1991 to 2003 were assigned the most difficult area in the north of Kuwait city—reclamation of Bubiyan Island was also entrusted to them. The operation was carried out by a task force of Pakistan Army Engineers. The professionalism and dedication displayed by this force was praised at international level.

While, inside the United Nations Transitional Authority on Cambodia (UNTAC), the Pakistan’s military forces carried out peacekeeping operations in the most thorny and remote areas during the period-May 1992 to August 1993. They overcame enormous logistic and operational problems, and proved their courage and determination by defending themselves and those for whom they were sent. Coping with the odds, they handled crisis after crisis and persuaded the warring factions to lay down their arms.

And, on the request of the UN in Latin America under the United Nations Mission in Haiti (UNMIH), Pakistan provided one infantry battalion, ‘PAKBAT’ which arrived in Haiti in March 1995 and was deployed in Cape Haitien—the area faced extremely volatile security situation and was also the hotbed of political agitation. ‘PAKBAT’ discharged its duties with an extensive patrolling program, covering various regions there.

Nevertheless, Pakistan’s army has worked in difficult terrains and situations for the global peace. Now, inside the country, although Pakistan Armed Forces are facing a tough situation in wake of war against terrorism, yet they are contributing to global peace and prosperity; having still a large number of their presence in various parts of the world.

Now, the major powers must abandon their false propaganda against Pakistan and its Armed Forces, as the latter did more in response of international demand of world peace.

Nonetheless, in pursuance of Pakistan Army’s unwavering commitment towards international peace, 130 Pakistani soldiers have sacrificed their lives. In this connection, Pakistan Armed Forces’ positive role in the UN peacekeeping measures reflects Pakistan’s desire to see the principles of human dignity, freedom and self-determination.

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com

May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power

May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power
May 28: Pakistan Became Nuclear Power

By Sajjad Shaukat

With national zeal and fervour in different parts of the country, Youm-e-Takbeer (The day of greatness) is celebrated every year on May 28 as a national day to mark the conduction of nuclear tests when on the very day in 1998; Pakistan became the first Muslim and the 7th nuclear power in the world.

While showing aggressive designs, on May 11, 1998, the then Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee surprised the international community by announcing that India has conducted 3 nuclear tests earlier that day. On May 13, 1998, India conducted two more nuclear tests.

However, both the neighboring countries have waged three wars, especially on the issue of the Indian occupied Kashmir, so Pakistan’s arch rival compelled Islamabad to follow the suit. In this regard, it took only 17 days for Pakistan to successfully carry out its five nuclear tests which were done on May 28 and the sixth one on May 1998, at Chaghi in Balochistan in response to five nuclear explosions detonated by India, threatening the security of Pakistan. For the purpose, about five thousands scientists including Dr Samarmand Mubarik and especially Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan had worked day and night and made the defence of the country impregnable.

As regards Pakistan’s atomic experiments, renowned journalist, Majid Nizami said, “Pakistan faced tremendous pressure from India after it detonated five nuclear devices and America in this scenario also did not want Pakistan to become a nuclear power. US President Clinton telephoned the Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif five times besides offering him billions of dollars to refrain him from nuclear tests. In this perspective, he further stated, Nawaz was receiving opinion from different sections of society, and in the same connection, he also convened a meeting of the editors wherein he (Majid Nizami) also gave the input.”

New Delhi’s war-mongering strategy against Pakistan could be judged from the fact that in 1974 India conducted first nuclear test at Pokhran Range in Rajhistan so as to pressurise Islamabad.

It is mentionable that when ZulfikarAli Bhutto, (The late) came to power, he paid much attention to the nuclear programme of Pakistan, as he knew that India would apply its coercive diplomacy on Islamabad or could attack our country. In this context, while talking on a TV channel on May 28, 2012, Pakistani nuclear scientist Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan appreciated the efforts of former Prime Minister Shaheed ZulfikarAli Bhutto for providing the opportunity to make the nuclear programme of Pakistan successful.

He also made it clear that Pakistan’s nuclear programme was totally indigenous, but acquired materials from some Western countries.

During many crises such as Kargil issue of 1999 and attack on the Indian parliament by the militants in 2001, New Delhi concentrated its troops across the Pakistan’s border, with the intention to attack Pakistan, while raising a series of false allegations against Islamabad. Pakistan was also compelled to deploy its Army along the Pak-India border. But, India did not dare to initiate a war because of Pakistan’s ‘Nukes.’ Similarly, in the past, Indian rulers had intended to implement their doctrine of limited war in Kashmir, but they could not do so owing to our nuclear weapons.

Particularly, in the aftermath of Mumbai terror attacks of 2008, India accused Pakistan’s spy agency, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) of supporting the militants. Although Pak diplomats denied Indian self-fabricated story regarding Mumbai catastrophe, but New Delhi adopted a threatening posture against Islamabad. It one again deployed its troops across the Pakistani border. Again, Islamabad also concentrated its military in order to give a matching response to India.

Notably, when US special forces killed Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan on May 2, 2011 in violation of Pak sovereignty—though Islamabad had repeatedly made it clear that its government and intelligence agencies did not know anything about Bin Laden’s whereabouts including any official involvement regarding the 26/11 Mumbai catastrophe, but, New Delhi continued its aggressive style which could be judged from the statement of Indian Army Chief Gen. VK Singh who claimed on May 4, 2011 that if situation arose, the Indian defence forces were competent to undertake a US-like operation inside Pakistan, which killed Al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden. Indian army’s Northern Command chief also expressed similar thought.

In this respect, Indian top civil and defence officials clearly said that their country could conduct a US-type military operation or surgical strikes inside Pakistan.

Nevertheless, in the aftermath of Mumbai attack, India left no stone unturned in frightening Pakistan through a prospective invasion. Violation of Pakistan’s air space by New Delhi had created an alarming situation, as Islamabad had also taken defensive steps in response to meet any aggression or surgical strikes by India. Situation was so critical that Pakistan started moving thousands of military troops from the Afghan border and the tribal areas to its border with India. But, India failed in implementing its plans of any military action or aerial strikes on Pakistan due to the fact that the latter also possesses nuclear arsenal which could destroy whole of India.

It is noteworthy that America dropped atomic bombs on Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as Tokyo had no such devices to retaliate. After the World War 11, nuclear weapons were never used. These were only employed as a strategic threat. During the heightened days of the Cold War, many crises arose in Suez Canal, Korea, Cuba and Vietnam when the US and the former Soviet Union were willing to use atomic weapons, but they stopped because of the fear of nuclear war which could culminate in the elimination of both the super powers. It was due to the concept of ‘mutually assured destruction’ that the two rivals preferred to resolve their differences through diplomacy.

Political strategists agree that deterrence is a psychological concept that aims to affect an opponent’s perceptions. In nuclear deterrence weapons are less usable as their threat is enough in deterring an enemy that intends to use its armed might.

While both the neighbouring adversaries are nuclear powers, Indians should not ignore the principles of deterrence, popularly known as balance of terror.

In these terms, India is badly mistaken, if it overestimates its own power and underestimates Pakistan’s power. As our country lacks conventional weapons vis-à-vis India, so it will have to use atomic devices during a prolonged conflict which would result into national suicide of the two countries. So India may apply its blackmailing diplomacy on the non-atomic states of South Asia in exerting psychological pressure, but it is useless in case of Pakistan whose deterrence is credible, making its defence invincible, as it possesses a variety of nuclear weapons and missiles which could be used against India as the last option, if the latter attacked our country.

Moreover, it is due to atomic bombs that Islamabad can talk to New Delhi with honour and dignity, discouraging India from casting an evil eye on our motherland.

Furthermore, as Pakistan is the only declared nuclear country in the Islamic World, hence, it has become special target of some western top officials and media persons who continue their propaganda against Pakistan’s nuclear programme. They have especially hired the services of media anchors and writers who work on their payroll and have been creating doubts about the safety and security of Pakistan’s atomic weapons and nuclear plants. Particularly, in 2009 when the heavily-armed Taliban entered Swat, Dir and Buner, US high officials and their media had exaggerated the ‘Talibinisation’ of whole Pakistan, while showing concerns about Pakistan’s atomic arms. In that regard, the then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had warned that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons could fall into the hands of terrorists. But, when Pakistan’s armed forces ejected the Taliban insurgents out of these areas by breaking their backbone, She started appreciating the capabilities of Pakistan Armed Forces.

Similarly, when terrorists had attacked on Pakistan’s Naval Airbase in Karachi on May 23, 2011, US-led some western countries including India and Israel exploited the situation through disinformation about the security of Pak nukes. And, terrorists’ assault on Kamra Base was successfully foiled by the personnel of Pakistan Air Force, but, a baseless report, published in the New York Times had indicated that suspected militants attacked a major Pakistani Air Force base where some of the country’s nuclear weapons were considered to be stored in the early hours of the militants’ attack. The ex-US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta also stated day, “There is a danger of nuclear weapons of Pakistan, falling into hands of terrorists.”

Undoubtedly, Pakistan’s nuclear assets are in safe hands-well-protected and are under tight security arrangements, having the best command and control system.

Nonetheless, May 28 is celebrated as Youm-e-Takbeer by various political parties and social organizations including general masses with a pledge to make Pakistan a stronger country, militarily and economically, among the comity of nations. No doubt, on this very day of 1998, Pakistan became nuclear power.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com