Indian Scheme of ‘Great Wall’ along LoC in Kashmir
Posted by Belharvi
With the technological advancement, new era of economic development has
changed the world in a global village. Long-awaited agreement which was
concluded between Iran and six world powers on November 24, this year
has endorsed this fact that Tehran is more interested in the welfare of
its people than to continue war of nerves with the US-led European
countries on the issue of its nuclear programme.
Taking cognizance of the modern world trends, Pakistan signed a number
of trade agreements with India, which allowed India exports of multiple
items across the Wagah border. During the visit of India’s External
Affairs Minister S M Krishna to Pakistan on September 9, 2012, both the
countries also signed a memorandum of understanding on cultural
exchanges in addition to agreeing on new cross-Line of Control (LoC)
Confidence Building Measures related to trade and travel. It was due to
Islamabad’s positive efforts through Aman-Ki-Asha and back door
diplomacy that it is sincere in building bridges of peace with New
Delhi. In this regard, while addressing the recent International
Literary Cultural Conference at Lahore, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif
pledged to resolve all outstanding issues with India besides lifting the
visa restrictions. In the recent past, Pakistani prime minister’s
foreign affairs adviser Sartaj Aziz who visited New Delhi held a meeting
with Indian External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid to defuse tension
at the Line of LoC and to restore the peace process. While keeping
pressure on Pakistan, Khurshid said that “the conditions of the dialogue
cannot be met till there is peace and tranquility on the LoC.”
Unfortunately, India has failed to reciprocate with the same spirit to
improve relations with Pakistan. Instead, it has always acted upon
duplicity by raising false allegations against Pakistan, its army and
Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) for sponsoring terrorism inside India
and especially in the Indian occupied Kashmir. In this respect,
recently, tension arose between both the countries when Indian military
conducted a series of unprovoked firings across the LoC, and
international border killing a number of soldiers of Pak Army and
innocent civilians in wake of war-like strategy which still continues.
On January 6, 2013, Indian soldiers crossed over the LoC in Kashmir and
attacked a Pakistani check post, killing one Pakistani soldier and
injuring many troops. Similarly, Indian troops also shot dead two
Pakistani soldiers on January 10 and 15.
In order to justify its open aggression, India concocted a fabricated
story of accusing Pakistan Army of killing its five soldiers on August
6, 2013. In this context, Indian External Affairs Minister Salman
Khurshid, Defence Minister AK Antony and the opposition fundamentalist
party BJP including Indian media blamed Pakistan Army for killing its
five soldiers.
It is mentionable that on September 29, 2013, Pakistan’s Prime Minister
Nawaz Sharif and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh held a meeting in
the sidelines of the annual UN summit. Afterwards, Indian National
Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon told reporters, “Both agreed that the
precondition for forward movement in the relationship, which they both
desire, is really an improvement of the situation on the Line of
Control.” However, their dialogue ended with optimistic note, but in his
speech in the General Assembly on September 28, Prime Minister Singh
had allegedly said, “It is equally important that the terrorist
machinery that draws its sustenance from Pakistan be shut down.” Showing
New Delhi’s contradictory approach, he also said that Jammu and Kashmir
was an integral part of India, and in this context there could never be
a compromise.
Nevertheless, talking about the twin terrorist attacks in the Indian
occupied Kashmir, which targeted a police station and a military camp,
killing 14 personnel of army and police, Salman Khurshid wrecked the
Nawaz-Manmohan talks when he blamed Pakistan’s ISI and the army in this
context.
While, Indian military high command failed in producing dead bodies of
alleged terrorists who had crossed the LoC from Pakistan to Indian-held
Kashmir. The ground realities proved that it was just propaganda against
ISI, and Pak Army, as indicated by the Indian media, Congress
Vice-president Rahul Gandhi and leaders of the Hindu fundamentalist
party, BJP.
On the one hand, Indian top officials have been accusing Pak Army and
ISI of sponsoring terrorism in India and the Indian-held Kashmir, on the
other, India’s media revealed in September, this year that on a defence
ministry directive, asking for the creation of covert capability—the
military intelligence unit, Technical Services Division (TSD) was set up
by the Indian Army Chief Gen. VK Singh (R), which conducted covert
operations in Pakistan. Besides, in an Indian TV Channel, Gen. VK Singh
openly confessed that TSD was raised by India to operate inside
Pakistan, particularly in Balochistan and Azad Kashmir to conduct
terrorism and to bribe the politicians in the Indian-held Kashmir to
crush the militancy (Kashmiri freedom fighters).
In fact, under the pretext of cross-border terrorism, New Delhi not only
suspended the peace process of dialogue with Pakistan, but also decided
to implement its scheme of erecting a Great Wall along the LoC in
Kashmir. A recent report published in the Economic Times disclosed that
Indian authorities are planning to construct a 10-meter high embankment
along 198-km stretch of international border which separates Indian held
Kashmir from Pakistan. The security wall will be higher and wider than
both the Berlin Wall and serpentine barrier being created by Israel. It
will be 135-feet wide and will pass through 118 villages of Districts
Jammu, Kathua and Samba.
Reportedly, initial work on the wall has begun and revenue papers for
designated land in 86 villages have been processed to get NOC from the
state government. A joint land demarcation in 44 villages is likely to
start soon. Although the total cost estimation has not been made public,
yet it has been decided that Indian Home Ministry will fund the
project, while it will be handled by Border Security Force (BSF).
Nonetheless, besides new pretension of the LoC violations, in the past
too, New Delhi availed various crises to suspend the process of
Pak-India talks. For example, in 2002, under the pretension of terrorist
attack on the Indian parliament, India postponed the dialogue process.
Again, in 2008, India suspended the ‘composite dialogue’ under the
pretext of Mumbai terror attacks which were in fact, arranged by its
secret agency RAW.
In the recent past, the Indian former officer of home ministry and
ex-investigating officer Satish Verma disclosed that terror-attacks in
Mumbai and assault on the Indian Parliament were carried out by the
Indian government to strengthen anti-terrorism legislation, particularly
in the Indian occupied Kashmir.
While, Indian top officials have always accused Pakistan of various
subversive acts of terrorists, but it is quite silent over Hindutva
(Hindu nationalism) terror which has obtained a new face, as Indian RAW,
country’s high officials and fundamentalist parties have
co-relationship.
Particularly, in January 2013, Indian Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde
revealed that organized training camps run by the fundamentalist
parties, RSS and BJP were promoting Hindu Terrorism, and were behind the
Samjhauta Express, Meccca Masjid, Ajmer Sharif and Malegaon blasts. He
also disclosed that these parties were involved many times in Hindu
Muslim violence in India, especially Gujarat and Babri Masjid incident.
It is noteworthy that Indian Hindus are followers of Chanakya (Say some
thing else and do some thing else). This fact has been verified by the
misdeeds of Hindu fundamentalist parties like BJP, RSS, VHP, Shiv Sina
and Bajrang Dal which have missed no opportunity to communalize national
politics of India even under the Congress rule. With the support of
Indian officials and RAW agents, these parties have been launching
anti-Christian and anti-Muslim bloodshed coupled with the dissemination
of Hindutva.
Notably, although the purpose of the Great Wall is to deter cross-border
intrusions into the Indian controlled Kashmir by Pakistan, yet New
Delhi intends to conceal its own state terrorism in Kashmir, and seems
determined to keep its illegitimate control on that region. While, with
the help of Israel, India has already built 12-feet high twin fences
along the LoC, running parallel to each other with an eight-foot gap in
the middle-filled with coils of razor-sharp concertina wire. India has
also installed special instruments like thermal imagers and sensors to
make the fence impregnable. In this context, the construction of the
Great Wall will symbolize the by-gone days of the Cold War. Such a
decision not only runs against the demands of time, but also uncovers
real face of New Delhi-indicating Indian deep seated animosity and
hatred against Pakistan.
India must know that Kashmir is a disputed territory and it would be
illegitimate to erect such a Great Wall which would also further stretch
distance between the people of Kashmir, living both sides of the LoC
which divides Azad Kashmir and Indian occupied Kashmir. This scheme will
also be rejected by the Kashmiri people, as they desperately desire to
have closer contacts with their Kashmiri brethren across the LoC.
Regrettably, Indian war-like diplomacy, followed by another move like
the scheme of Great Wall will further escalate tension between New Delhi
and Islamabad. It is likely to take them away from the peace process by
creating obstacles in the practical solution to their bilateral issues,
particularly of Kashmir. This plan could further intensify arms race
between both the neighboring nuclear countries, ultimately resulting
into regional instability, turning hope for peace and prosperity into
state of distress.
(By Sajjad Shaukat)
The human rights record of the Indian army stands for zero tolerance for any principles of justice. The fact that in 23 years the Indian State [Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Defence] has not granted sanction for prosecution in a civilian court under AFSPA sends a clear message: the State forces will commit crimes, deny sanction for civilian prosecution, carry out their own court-martials in exceptional cases, and ensure zero transparency or accountability. Therefore, the recent statement of the Indian army must be understood to be nothing but a part of the 2011 army doctrine – WHAM [Winning Hearts and Minds] – an attempt to mislead the people of the true role and intentions of the Indian State, as the Indian State is institutionally responsible for the crimes perpetrated on the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
ReplyDelete